Home › AI Laws › Colorado › Denver, CO
AI Laws in Denver, CO, Colorado
As of 2026-07-26, AI Laws USA tracks 24 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Denver, CO, Colorado: 10+ federal protections, 13 Colorado state-level rules, and 1 local Denver, CO ordinance. Coverage is strongest on automated decision-making, consumer protection, AI hiring and employment, and government use of AI. 7 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.
Denver, CO local AI rules
1 local AI rule specific to Denver, CO, Colorado.
-
Expired Limited protection
Denver ends Flock Safety ALPR contract and replaces vendor a
Denver, CO · Denver ends Flock Safety ALPR contract and replaces vendor amid data-sharing concerns
After Denver ended its Flock contract over privacy and federal data-sharing concerns, the City Council voted on March 31, 2026 to approve a smaller replacement ALPR contract with Axon, with several members demanding an ALPR-regulating ordinance first.
Colorado-level AI rules most relevant to Denver, CO
13 Colorado state rules apply to residents and businesses in Denver, CO. Showing the 8 most relevant to Denver, CO's local picture; 5 more are on the Colorado jurisdiction page.
-
In effect Limited protection
CO SB 17-213 (AV statute)
Colorado · Effective 2017-06-01 · Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-4-242
Colorado authorized automated driving systems, allowing AVs that can comply with all traffic laws to operate without a separate state authorization — but if the ADS cannot fully comply, the operator must coordinate with CDOT and the State Patrol before deployment.
-
Repealed / replaced Limited protection
Colorado AI Act (repealed)
Colorado · Enacted 2024-05-17 · SB 24-205, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1701 et seq. (repealed/replaced 2026)
The first comprehensive US state AI law would have required developers and deployers of 'high-risk' AI systems to use reasonable care to prevent algorithmic discrimination in decisions about jobs, housing, lending, insurance, education, and healthcare. After repeated delays, it was repealed and replaced in May 2026 by a narrower transparency-focused law (SB 26-189) before it ever took effect.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Limited protection
SB 26-189 (Colorado ADMT Law)
Colorado · Effective 2027-01-01 · SB 26-189 (Colo. 2026)
Colorado's replacement AI law focuses on transparency rather than broad anti-discrimination duties. Starting January 1, 2027, companies using automated decision-making technology to materially influence consequential decisions (employment, housing, lending, insurance, healthcare) must notify consumers before use and provide post-decision disclosures; developers must give deployers technical documentation.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Limited protection
CO ADMT Act (SB 26-189, 2026)
Colorado · Effective 2027-01-01 · Colo. SB 26-189 (2026), signed May 14, 2026, eff. January 1, 2027
Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed SB 26-189 on May 14, 2026, repealing and replacing the original Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205) before it could take effect. The replacement law creates a disclosure-focused framework for 'Automated Decision-Making Technology' (ADMT) — a narrower category than the prior law's 'high-risk AI' — applicable to consequential decisions in employment, housing, healthcare, credit, education, insurance, and government services. The original Colorado AI Act had been blocked by a federal court on constitutional grounds days before the replacement was passed. The new ADMT Act takes effect January 1, 2027.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Moderate protection
CO AI Act (SB 24-205)
CO · Effective 2027-01-01 · Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 6-1-1701 to 6-1-1707; SB 24-205 (2024)
Colorado was the first state to enact a comprehensive AI law regulating high-risk AI used to make consequential decisions about Coloradans — including credit, insurance, employment, housing, healthcare, and government services. It requires risk management, bias audits, and consumer disclosure; deceptive AI practices are deemed unfair under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
-
Repealed / replaced Unknown
CO SB24-205 (original)
CO · Effective 2026-02-01 · Colo. SB 24-205 (2024) — substantially superseded by SB 26-189 (May 14, 2026)
Colorado SB24-205 was the first U.S. comprehensive high-risk AI statute (2024). The original framework was substantially rewritten by SB 26-189 after the 2026 special session — this entry is the historical record of the original law.
-
Proposed / pending Limited protection
Colorado Attorney General Rulemaking for the Automated Decis
Colorado · Effective 2026-06-30 · Colorado Attorney General Rulemaking for the Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) Act and Chatbot Safety Act
The Colorado Attorney General's Office opened pre-rulemaking to write rules implementing the state's Automated Decision-Making Technology Act (algorithmic-discrimination protections for high-risk AI) and the Chatbot Safety Act, taking public comment through July 13, 2026 ahead of the laws' January 1, 2027 effective date.
-
In effect Limited protection
Colorado Roadmap for AI in K-12 Education
Colorado Department of Education · Effective 2024-08-01 · Colorado Roadmap for AI in K-12 Education
Colorado's education department (with the Colorado Education Initiative) published a statewide roadmap providing K-12 districts practical strategies and resources for integrating AI into teaching and learning.
Federal AI rules that apply in Denver, CO, Colorado
These federal protections apply everywhere in the United States, including Denver, CO, Colorado. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Bartz v. Anthropic
N.D. Cal. · Effective 2025-09-05 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)
Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) were not adjudicated to a final ruling — they proceeded toward settlement. In September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement, though Judge Alsup denied preliminary approval without prejudice pending additional information on the claims protocol and attorney fees.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Benavides v. Tesla (Autopilot)
S.D. Fla. · Effective 2025-08-01 · Benavides v. Tesla, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-21940 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2025)
A Florida federal jury found Tesla 33% liable in August 2025 for the 2019 death of Naibel Benavides Leon, in a crash involving Autopilot. The jury awarded $243M ($129M compensatory + $200M punitive); in February 2026 the court denied Tesla's post-trial motions and upheld the verdict in full — the first Autopilot wrongful-death verdict against Tesla.
-
In effect Stronger protection
COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)
United States · Effective 2025-06-23 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312
COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.
-
In effect Stronger protection
TAKE IT DOWN Act
United States · Effective 2025-05-19 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)
Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.
-
Blocked / in litigation Stronger protection
NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)
S.D. Ohio · Effective 2025-04-16 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)
Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)
D.C. Cir. · Effective 2025-03-18 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)
The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Thomson Reuters v. Ross
D. Del. · Effective 2025-02-11 · Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. Ross Intelligence, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00613 (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025)
Thomson Reuters sued legal-research startup Ross Intelligence in 2020 for copying Westlaw headnotes to train a competing AI legal-research tool. In February 2025, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation) granted summary judgment to Thomson Reuters on direct copyright infringement and rejected Ross's fair-use defense — the first definitive U.S. ruling on AI-training fair use. No jury trial occurred: a 2023 opinion had denied summary judgment and pointed toward trial, but the court invited renewed briefing and reversed course in the 2025 ruling.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Louis v. SafeRent
D. Mass. · Effective 2024-11-20 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)
SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.
-
In effect Stronger protection
FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)
United States · Effective 2024-04-01 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017
The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.
-
In effect Stronger protection
TCPA (AI voice calls)
United States · Effective 2024-02-08 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17
Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.
Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Denver, CO, Colorado
Are there AI laws in Denver, CO, Colorado?
What federal AI rules apply in Denver, CO?
Does Colorado have an AI privacy law?
Are deepfakes illegal in Colorado?
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Denver, CO?
How do I report an AI law violation in Denver, CO?
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Denver, CO?
Is Denver, CO regulated by Colorado's consumer privacy act?
Compliance guides for Colorado businesses
Plain-English guides to the Colorado AI & data laws companies most often need to comply with:
Have we missed an AI rule in Denver, CO?
This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Denver, CO ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email [email protected] or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.