HomeAI LawsWest VirginiaHuntington

AI Laws in Huntington, West Virginia

As of 2026-07-19, AI Laws USA tracks 15 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Huntington, West Virginia: 10+ federal protections, 3 West Virginia state-level rules, and 2 local Huntington ordinances. Coverage is strongest on consumer data privacy, police and surveillance AI, automated decision-making, and AI-generated images. 4 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Huntington local AI rules (and Cabell County)

2 local AI rules specific to Huntington, West Virginia or Cabell County.

  1. In effect Limited protection

    Huntington WV Flock contract approved 6-4 (Jul. 14, 2026)

    Huntington, WV · Effective 2026-07-14 · Huntington, WV City Council 6-4 vote, July 14, 2026, approving $2.1M Flock Safety surveillance contract

    The Huntington, West Virginia City Council voted 6-4 on July 14, 2026 to approve a $2.1 million contract with Flock Safety for a citywide surveillance package: 40 automated license plate readers, 17 cameras, 2 drones, 2 gunshot detectors, and audio detection capability. The vote came after a council meeting that ran more than 8 hours, at which more than 50 residents spoke in opposition. This entry indexes a government AI surveillance deployment, not a protection; available coverage describes no independent oversight, audit requirement, or data-sharing restrictions attached to the approval. Two days later the ACLU of West Virginia filed a mandamus petition challenging the contract (see litig-aclu-wv-v-huntington-flock-2026).

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  2. Blocked / in litigation Moderate protection

    ACLU-WV v. Huntington (Flock contract mandamus)

    Huntington, WV · Effective 2026-07-16 · ACLU-WV mandamus petition (relator Gregory Jimison) v. City of Huntington and Mayor Farrell, Cabell County Circuit Court, filed July 16, 2026

    On July 16, 2026 — two days after the Huntington City Council approved a $2.1 million Flock Safety surveillance contract 6-4 — the ACLU of West Virginia filed a mandamus petition in Cabell County Circuit Court against the City of Huntington and Mayor Farrell seeking to block the contract. Rather than a constitutional privacy claim, the petition rests on a procurement/property-law theory challenging how the city entered the contract. The relator (the party on whose behalf mandamus is sought) is Huntington resident Gregory Jimison. The case is an early example of surveillance-contract litigation attacking the purchasing process itself.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

West Virginia-level AI rules

3 West Virginia state rules apply to residents and businesses in Huntington. Sorted strongest first.

  1. In effect Limited protection

    WV DOI AI Bulletin

    WV · Effective 2024-08-09 · West Virginia OIC Insurance Bulletin 24-06 (2024-08-09)

    The WV Department of Insurance adopted the NAIC Model Bulletin on Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers. Insurers licensed in WV must maintain a written AI program with governance, risk-management, testing, third-party-AI oversight, and documentation controls. The bulletin operationalizes existing unfair-trade-practice and unfair-discrimination law as applied to insurers' AI use cases — underwriting, pricing, claims, fraud detection, and marketing.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  2. In effect Limited protection

    WV Fabricated Intimate Images Law

    West Virginia · WV Code § 61-8-28a; WV Code § 55-20

    West Virginia's intimate-images law explicitly covers AI-generated 'fabricated intimate images' — images created with AI or computer technology depicting someone's intimate parts. Disclosure or threats to disclose with intent to harass or coerce is a misdemeanor (first offense) and felony for repeats, with civil remedies under a separate uniform act.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  3. In effect Limited protection

    West Virginia SB 198 (criminalizes AI/computer-generated child pornography)

    West Virginia · Effective 2025-07-09 · S.B. 198, 2025 Reg. Sess. (W. Va.); W. Va. Code 61-8C-12

    West Virginia made it a crime to create, produce, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute computer-generated or AI-generated child pornography, even when no real child was used. The law specifies that it is not a defense that an actual minor does not exist, and treats a depiction that appears to be a person under 18 as covered. Violations carry one to ten years of imprisonment and a fine of up to $20,000.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

Full West Virginia jurisdiction page →

Federal AI rules that apply in Huntington, West Virginia

These federal protections apply everywhere in the United States, including Huntington, West Virginia. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Stronger protection

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective 2025-09-05 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) were not adjudicated to a final ruling — they proceeded toward settlement. In September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement, though Judge Alsup denied preliminary approval without prejudice pending additional information on the claims protocol and attorney fees.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  2. In effect Stronger protection

    Benavides v. Tesla (Autopilot)

    S.D. Fla. · Effective 2025-08-01 · Benavides v. Tesla, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-21940 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2025)

    A Florida federal jury found Tesla 33% liable in August 2025 for the 2019 death of Naibel Benavides Leon, in a crash involving Autopilot. The jury awarded $243M ($129M compensatory + $200M punitive); in February 2026 the court denied Tesla's post-trial motions and upheld the verdict in full — the first Autopilot wrongful-death verdict against Tesla.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  3. In effect Stronger protection

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective 2025-06-23 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  4. In effect Stronger protection

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective 2025-05-19 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  5. Blocked / in litigation Stronger protection

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective 2025-04-16 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  6. In effect Stronger protection

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective 2025-03-18 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  7. In effect Stronger protection

    Thomson Reuters v. Ross

    D. Del. · Effective 2025-02-11 · Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. Ross Intelligence, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00613 (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025)

    Thomson Reuters sued legal-research startup Ross Intelligence in 2020 for copying Westlaw headnotes to train a competing AI legal-research tool. In February 2025, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation) granted summary judgment to Thomson Reuters on direct copyright infringement and rejected Ross's fair-use defense — the first definitive U.S. ruling on AI-training fair use. No jury trial occurred: a 2023 opinion had denied summary judgment and pointed toward trial, but the court invited renewed briefing and reversed course in the 2025 ruling.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  8. In effect Stronger protection

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective 2024-11-20 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  9. In effect Stronger protection

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective 2024-04-01 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  10. In effect Stronger protection

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective 2024-02-08 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

See all federal AI rules →

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Huntington, West Virginia

Are there AI laws in Huntington, West Virginia?
Yes. We index 2 local AI rules that specifically apply in Huntington, West Virginia, including Huntington WV Flock contract approved 6-4 (Jul. 14, 2026), ACLU-WV v. Huntington (Flock contract mandamus). On top of that, 3 West Virginia state-level rules and 10+ federal AI protections apply throughout the city.
What federal AI rules apply in Huntington?
Every federal AI protection in our index applies in Huntington, West Virginia. The highest-strength federal rules currently include Bartz v. Anthropic, Benavides v. Tesla (Autopilot), COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does West Virginia have an AI privacy law?
West Virginia has 1 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rule in our index, including WV DOI AI Bulletin. These apply to residents of Huntington.
Are deepfakes illegal in West Virginia?
West Virginia has 2 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including WV Fabricated Intimate Images Law and West Virginia SB 198 (criminalizes AI/computer-generated child pornography). Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Huntington?
Huntington, West Virginia has no AI-employment-screening-specific rule in our index. Federal Title VII, ADA, and EEOC guidance still apply, plus any general West Virginia anti-discrimination statutes.
How do I report an AI law violation in Huntington?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For West Virginia state laws, the West Virginia Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each protection entry. We also accept tips at [email protected].
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Huntington?
Huntington, West Virginia has no facial-recognition-specific rule in our index. Use by private businesses is largely unregulated, while government use is governed by general Fourth Amendment and West Virginia law.
Is Huntington regulated by West Virginia's consumer privacy act?
Yes. West Virginia state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Huntington. See the West Virginia jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Huntington?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Huntington ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email [email protected] or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.