HomeAI LawsTexasKaty

AI Laws in Katy, Texas

As of 2026-06-17, AI Laws USA tracks 36 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Katy, Texas: 10+ federal protections, 25 Texas state-level rules, and 1 local Katy ordinance. Coverage is strongest on consumer protection, automated decision-making, consumer data privacy, and deepfakes. 26 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Katy local AI rules (and Harris County)

1 local AI rule specific to Katy, Texas or Harris County.

  1. In effect Limited protection

    Katy ISD TX

    Katy, TX · Effective 2024-09-23 · Katy ISD TX — AI Acceptable Use Guidelines (2024-09-23)

    District guidelines require vetted AI tool list, ban student AI use without teacher direction in grades K-8, prohibit ingestion of student records into generative tools, and treat undisclosed AI submissions as academic dishonesty.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

Texas-level AI rules most relevant to Katy

25 Texas state rules apply to residents and businesses in Katy. Showing the 8 most relevant to Katy's local picture; 17 more are on the Texas jurisdiction page.

  1. In effect Limited protection

    TDPSA

    Texas · Effective 2024-07-01 · Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 541 (HB 4, 2023)

    Texans can access, correct, delete, and obtain copies of personal data held by covered businesses, and can opt out of targeted advertising, data sales, and profiling used for decisions with significant effects (like jobs, housing, or credit). Businesses must get consent for sensitive data, including biometrics.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  2. In effect Moderate protection

    TX TRAIGA (HB 149)

    TX · Effective 2026-01-01 · Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ch. 552; HB 149 (89th Leg., R.S., 2025)

    Texas passed a comprehensive AI law that, among other things, prohibits AI systems intentionally developed to engage in unlawful discrimination or behavioral manipulation, criminalizes AI-generated child sexual abuse material, and gives the Texas Attorney General sweeping enforcement authority over deceptive AI practices. Compliance began January 1, 2026.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  3. In effect Moderate protection

    Texas v. Allstate / Arity

    TX · Effective 2025-01-13 · Texas v. Allstate / Arity — Driving Data Collection Suit (TDPSA + Data Broker Law) (2025-01-13)

    First-ever TDPSA and Data Broker Law suit. Alleges SDK-based collection of geolocation and driving-behavior data from 45M+ Americans via Life360, GasBuddy, etc., used to score drivers and set premiums. Active in 2026.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  4. In effect Limited protection

    TX AG Paxton AI scam alert

    TX · Effective 2025-03-19 · Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.46; TX OAG Consumer Alert (Mar. 19, 2025)

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton warned Texans about AI voice-cloning scams, AI-generated romance and investment fraud, and deepfake impersonation of family members — and pledged DTPA enforcement against bad actors. Builds on the TX AG's Pieces Technologies settlement and TRAIGA implementation.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  5. In effect Moderate protection

    Texas v. Pieces Technologies

    TX · Effective 2024-09-18 · Texas v. Pieces Technologies — Healthcare Generative AI Settlement (2024-09-18)

    First state AG settlement targeting deceptive GenAI clinical marketing. Alleged Pieces misrepresented hallucination rates of a hospital summarization tool at four TX hospitals; settlement mandates accurate disclosures and monitoring. This action is an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance (AVC), not a monetary settlement; no penalty was assessed and Pieces Technologies denies wrongdoing.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  6. In effect Moderate protection

    TX SB 2205 (2017 AV statute)

    Texas · Effective 2017-09-01 · Tex. Transp. Code §§ 545.451–545.456

    Texas's main autonomous-vehicle law explicitly authorizes AVs to operate on Texas roads without a human driver, defines the 'owner' of an automated driving system as the legal operator for liability and traffic enforcement, and preempts local AV bans. It set the framework that later allowed Waymo, Cruise, and Aurora freight to operate in Texas.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  7. In effect Moderate protection

    TX Med Board AI Statement

    TX · Effective 2024-06-14 · Tex. Med. Bd. Statement (June 14, 2024)

    Texas physicians using AI in patient care remain personally responsible for the diagnostic, treatment, and prescribing decisions — and must obtain patient consent, document AI-assisted decisions, and ensure AI tools meet the standard of care. Hiding behind 'the AI said so' is not a defense to a malpractice or medical-board complaint.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  8. In effect Limited protection

    TRAIGA

    Texas · Effective 2026-01-01 · Tex. HB 149 (2025), TRAIGA

    Texas's AI law bans specific harmful uses of AI — intentional discrimination, behavioral manipulation encouraging self-harm or crime, social scoring by government, and certain biometric identification without consent — and requires government agencies to disclose AI interactions to consumers. It includes a regulatory sandbox and preempts local AI ordinances.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

See all 25 Texas AI rules →

Federal AI rules that apply in Katy, Texas

These federal protections apply everywhere in the United States, including Katy, Texas. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Stronger protection

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective 2025-09-05 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup issued a split ruling: training on lawfully purchased books was fair use, but ingesting pirated copies from LibGen was not. In September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement — the largest AI copyright recovery to date.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  2. In effect Stronger protection

    Banner v. Tesla (Autopilot)

    S.D. Fla. · Effective 2025-08-01 · Banner v. Tesla, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-21940 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2025)

    A Florida federal jury found Tesla 33% liable in August 2025 for the 2019 death of Naibel Benavides Leon, in a crash involving Autopilot. The verdict awarded $243M (later reduced to ~$220M) — the first Autopilot wrongful-death verdict against Tesla.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  3. In effect Stronger protection

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective 2025-06-23 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  4. In effect Stronger protection

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective 2025-05-19 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  5. In effect Stronger protection

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective 2025-03-18 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is constitutional and dispositive. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  6. In effect Stronger protection

    Thomson Reuters v. Ross

    D. Del. · Effective 2025-02-11 · Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. Ross Intelligence, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 3d 467 (D. Del. 2025)

    Thomson Reuters sued legal-research startup Ross Intelligence in 2020 for copying Westlaw headnotes to train a competing AI legal-research tool. In February 2025, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation) granted summary judgment to Thomson Reuters on direct copyright infringement and rejected Ross's fair-use defense — the first definitive U.S. ruling on AI-training fair use. The 2023 jury trial verdict had been deadlocked; the 2025 ruling resolved liability.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  7. In effect Stronger protection

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective 2024-11-20 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  8. In effect Stronger protection

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective 2024-04-30 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2024)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was permanently enjoined as unconstitutional in April 2024.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  9. In effect Stronger protection

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective 2024-04-01 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

  10. In effect Stronger protection

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective 2024-02-08 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry →  ·  Official source ↗

See all federal AI rules →

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Katy, Texas

Are there AI laws in Katy, Texas?
Yes. We index 1 local AI rule that specifically apply in Katy, Texas, including Katy ISD TX. On top of that, 25 Texas state-level rules and 10+ federal AI protections apply throughout the city.
What federal AI rules apply in Katy?
Every federal AI protection in our index applies in Katy, Texas. The highest-strength federal rules currently include Bartz v. Anthropic, Banner v. Tesla (Autopilot), COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Texas have an AI privacy law?
Texas has 14 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including Texas CUBI (2009) and Texas v. Google ($1.375B). These apply to residents of Katy.
Are deepfakes illegal in Texas?
Texas has 10 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including TX TRAIGA (HB 149) and TX HB 2700 — AI/Altered CSAM. Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Katy?
Katy, Texas has no AI-employment-screening-specific rule in our index. Federal Title VII, ADA, and EEOC guidance still apply, plus any general Texas anti-discrimination statutes.
How do I report an AI law violation in Katy?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Texas state laws, the Texas Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each protection entry. We also accept tips at [email protected].
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Katy?
Facial-recognition use in Katy, Texas is addressed by Texas CUBI (2009) and Texas v. Google ($1.375B). See those entries for what is allowed, who must comply, and enforcement details.
Is Katy regulated by Texas's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Texas state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Katy. See the Texas jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Katy?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Katy ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email [email protected] or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.