Home › AI Laws › Georgia › Marietta
AI Laws in Marietta, Georgia
As of 2026-06-17, AI Laws USA tracks 19 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Marietta, Georgia: 10+ federal protections, 7 Georgia state-level rules, and 2 local Marietta/county ordinances. Coverage is strongest on automated decision-making, children's online safety, consumer protection, and consumer data privacy. 6 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.
Marietta local AI rules (and Cobb County)
2 local AI rules specific to Marietta, Georgia or Cobb County.
-
In effect Limited protection
Cobb County GA School District
Marietta, GA · Effective 2025-09-11 · Cobb County GA School District — AI Acceptable Use Guidelines (2025-09-11)
District-issued AUG: requires staff training before classroom AI use, bars use of AI for grading core subjects without teacher review, mandates that any third-party AI vendor sign Cobb's Data Privacy Addendum, and prohibits ingestion of student work into models that train on submissions.
-
In effect Moderate protection
Cobb County GA Temporary Data Center Moratorium (up to 180 days)
Cobb County, GA · Effective 2026-02-09 · Resolution Feb 2026 (2026-02-09)
Pauses new data center applications in unincorporated Cobb while staff reviews development regs; does not apply inside Marietta city limits.
Georgia-level AI rules
7 Georgia state rules apply to residents and businesses in Marietta. Sorted strongest first.
-
In effect Moderate protection
GA SB 219 (2017 AV statute)
Georgia · Effective 2017-07-01 · 2017 Ga. Laws Act 245
Georgia legalized fully driverless autonomous vehicles statewide, required AVs to be registered, insured ($250,000 minimum for fully autonomous vehicles), and capable of complying with traffic laws. The statute preempts local AV-specific ordinances.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Limited protection
SB 540 (GA Chatbot Safety)
Georgia · Effective 2027-07-01 · Ga. SB 540 (2026)
Georgia — the first Republican-led state to do so — enacted a chatbot safety law. Operators must tell users they're talking to AI, verify ages, give parents controls, and follow crisis protocols (like referring to the 988 lifeline) when users express suicidal thoughts. Chatbots talking to minors can't claim to be sentient, produce sexual content, simulate romance, encourage secrets from adults, or fake distress when a child ends the chat. No carve-out for chatbots inside big platforms. Effective July 1, 2027.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Limited protection
SB 444 (GA AI Insurance Review)
Georgia · Effective 2027-01-01 · Ga. SB 444 (2026), sponsored by Sen. Kay Kirkpatrick
Health insurers in Georgia can't let AI alone decide your coverage. Decisions about insurance coverage for healthcare services cannot be based solely on AI systems or software tools — a qualified human reviewer must be part of every coverage determination, especially before denying treatment. Effective January 1, 2027.
-
In effect Limited protection
GA SB 466 (no 'it's AI' defense for CSAM)
Georgia · Effective 2024-07-01 · Ga. SB 466 (2024); O.C.G.A. Sec. 16-12-100
Georgia's child sexual exploitation law was amended so that a defendant cannot escape liability by arguing the illegal imagery was artificially generated, adapted, or modified rather than a photograph of an actual child. If the material was created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaged in sexually explicit conduct, that is no defense to prosecution. This closes a potential loophole for AI-generated or computer-edited child sexual abuse material.
-
In effect Limited protection
GA Synthetic NCII Transmission Law
Georgia · Effective 2022-05-02 · O.C.G.A. Sec. 16-11-90
Georgia makes it a crime to electronically send or post a nude or sexually explicit image of an identifiable adult without that person's consent when the purpose is to harass or cause financial harm. The statute expressly reaches a 'falsely created' video or still image, meaning synthetic or deepfake depictions are treated the same as real photographs. Posting such material to certain explicit websites is punished more harshly than other electronic transmission.
-
Vetoed Proposed or pending
GA Data Center Tax Break Fight
Georgia · Ga. HB 1192 (2024) (vetoed); O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(68.1) (exemption in effect)
Georgia lawmakers voted in 2024 to pause new data center sales tax exemptions for two years, but Governor Kemp vetoed the bill, keeping the tax break in place. The fight resumed in the 2026 session with bills to sunset or repeal the exemption, one of which passed the Senate.
-
In effect Moderate protection
Walters v. OpenAI
GA · Effective 2025-05-19 · Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C., No. 23-A-04860-2 (Gwinnett Cty. Super. Ct., Ga.)
Georgia radio host Mark Walters sued OpenAI after ChatGPT fabricated a story that he had embezzled from a gun-rights nonprofit. In May 2025, Judge Tracie Cason granted summary judgment to OpenAI, holding that no reasonable reader would treat ChatGPT output as a statement of fact and that OpenAI's disclaimers about hallucinations defeated 'actual malice.' The first U.S. AI defamation case to reach a merits ruling.
Federal AI rules that apply in Marietta, Georgia
These federal protections apply everywhere in the United States, including Marietta, Georgia. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Bartz v. Anthropic
N.D. Cal. · Effective 2025-09-05 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)
Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup issued a split ruling: training on lawfully purchased books was fair use, but ingesting pirated copies from LibGen was not. In September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement — the largest AI copyright recovery to date.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Banner v. Tesla (Autopilot)
S.D. Fla. · Effective 2025-08-01 · Banner v. Tesla, Inc., No. 1:21-cv-21940 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2025)
A Florida federal jury found Tesla 33% liable in August 2025 for the 2019 death of Naibel Benavides Leon, in a crash involving Autopilot. The verdict awarded $243M (later reduced to ~$220M) — the first Autopilot wrongful-death verdict against Tesla.
-
In effect Stronger protection
COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)
United States · Effective 2025-06-23 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312
COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.
-
In effect Stronger protection
TAKE IT DOWN Act
United States · Effective 2025-05-19 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)
Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)
D.C. Cir. · Effective 2025-03-18 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)
The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is constitutional and dispositive. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Thomson Reuters v. Ross
D. Del. · Effective 2025-02-11 · Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. Ross Intelligence, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 3d 467 (D. Del. 2025)
Thomson Reuters sued legal-research startup Ross Intelligence in 2020 for copying Westlaw headnotes to train a competing AI legal-research tool. In February 2025, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation) granted summary judgment to Thomson Reuters on direct copyright infringement and rejected Ross's fair-use defense — the first definitive U.S. ruling on AI-training fair use. The 2023 jury trial verdict had been deadlocked; the 2025 ruling resolved liability.
-
In effect Stronger protection
Louis v. SafeRent
D. Mass. · Effective 2024-11-20 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)
SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.
-
In effect Stronger protection
NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)
S.D. Ohio · Effective 2024-04-30 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2024)
Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was permanently enjoined as unconstitutional in April 2024.
-
In effect Stronger protection
FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)
United States · Effective 2024-04-01 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017
The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.
-
In effect Stronger protection
TCPA (AI voice calls)
United States · Effective 2024-02-08 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17
Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.
Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Marietta, Georgia
Are there AI laws in Marietta, Georgia?
What federal AI rules apply in Marietta?
Does Georgia have an AI privacy law?
Are deepfakes illegal in Georgia?
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Marietta?
How do I report an AI law violation in Marietta?
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Marietta?
Is Marietta regulated by Georgia's consumer privacy act?
Have we missed an AI rule in Marietta?
This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Marietta ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email [email protected] or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.