HomeLegal DirectoryEEOC v. iTutorGroup

In effect Stronger protection

EEOC v. iTutorGroup — First Federal AI Hiring Discrimination Consent Decree (E.D.N.Y.)

E.D.N.Y. · EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-02565 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2023)

The EEOC's first AI-hiring-discrimination case ended with a $365,000 consent decree in September 2023. iTutorGroup's online application system was programmed to auto-reject female applicants 55+ and male applicants 60+ — a clear ADEA violation through algorithmic age screening.

Technical detail

EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-02565 (E.D.N.Y., consent decree Sept. 11, 2023; Judge Pamela K. Chen). $365,000 settlement plus injunctive relief: rewrite application software to remove date-of-birth-based exclusion, post anti-discrimination policy, three-year EEOC monitoring, train recruiters and developers on ADEA compliance for automated screening.

Who is protected: U.S. workers age 40+ subject to automated employment decisions

Who must comply: iTutorGroup, Inc. and similarly situated employers using algorithmic age-screening

Key facts

JurisdictionE.D.N.Y.
LevelFederal
StatusIn effect
Protection strengthStronger protection
Effective date2023-09-11
CitationEEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-02565 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2023)
TopicsAI hiring and employment · automated decision-making
Last verified2026-06-17
Official sourceEEOC v. iTutorGroup — EEOC press release ↗

Related AI hiring and employment rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.