FTC v. IntelliVision Technologies — Facial Recognition Accuracy / Bias Claims Settlement
FTC · In re IntelliVision Techs. Corp., FTC No. C-4813 (Dec. 19, 2024)
The FTC settled with IntelliVision in December 2024, alleging the company falsely claimed its facial-recognition product had 'zero gender or racial bias' without testing-data to support that — and that its accuracy claims were unsubstantiated. Builds on the FTC's Rite Aid theory.
Technical detail
In re IntelliVision Technologies Corp., FTC No. C-4813 (Dec. 19, 2024). FTC Act § 5 deception. Order: cease unsupported accuracy / bias claims; conduct ongoing testing across demographic groups; disclose performance characteristics; maintain compliance program.
Who is protected: Consumers and downstream deployers of facial-recognition systems making bias-free / accuracy claims
Who must comply: IntelliVision Technologies Corp. and similar FRT vendors
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | FTC |
|---|---|
| Level | Federal |
| Status | In effect |
| Protection strength | Moderate protection |
| Effective date | 2024-12-19 |
| Citation | In re IntelliVision Techs. Corp., FTC No. C-4813 (Dec. 19, 2024) |
| Topics | facial recognition · biometric data · consumer protection · AI disclosure and transparency |
| Last verified | 2026-06-17 |
| Official source | FTC Action Against IntelliVision — FTC press release ↗ |
More AI rules in FTC
- FTC v. Rite Aid · In effect
- FTC v. Amazon (Ring) · In effect
- FTC v. Amazon (Alexa) · In effect
- FTC v. NGL Labs · In effect
- FTC v. DoNotPay · In effect
- FTC v. Rytr · In effect
Related facial recognition rules elsewhere
- BIPA · In effect
- AI Video Interview Act · In effect
- New Hampshire HB 1688 (state-agency AI limits) · In effect
- Montana HB 178 (limits on government AI use) · In effect
- NYPD POST Act · In effect
- SF Facial Recognition Ban · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.