HomeLegal DirectoryKadrey v. Meta

Blocked / in litigation Moderate protection

Kadrey v. Meta Platforms — Author Copyright Class Action against Llama (N.D. Cal.)

N.D. Cal. · Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417 (N.D. Cal.)

Authors Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden — later joined by Junot Díaz, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Andrew Sean Greer and others — sued Meta in July 2023 over the use of pirated books (LibGen / Books3) to train Llama. In June 2025 Judge Chhabria granted Meta partial summary judgment on fair use for these specific plaintiffs, but the ruling was narrow and the case continues on remaining theories.

Technical detail

Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417 (N.D. Cal., filed July 7, 2023; Judge Vince Chhabria). Claims: direct copyright infringement, DMCA § 1202, unfair competition. Nov. 20, 2023: most non-direct-infringement claims dismissed. June 25, 2025: court granted summary judgment to Meta on fair use as applied to these plaintiffs' Llama-training claim, while emphasizing the result was driven by plaintiffs' failure of proof on market harm and was not a categorical endorsement of training-on-pirated-books as fair use. Other plaintiffs in the consolidated proceedings continue to litigate.

Who is protected: Class of U.S. book authors whose works appear in LibGen / Books3 training corpora

Who must comply: Meta Platforms, Inc.

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
StatusBlocked / in litigation
Protection strengthModerate protection
Effective date2023-07-07
CitationKadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417 (N.D. Cal.)
Topicscopyright and training data
Last verified2026-06-17
Official sourceKadrey v. Meta — CourtListener 3:23-cv-03417 ↗

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related copyright and training data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.