HomeLegal DirectoryLehrman v. Lovo

Blocked / in litigation Moderate protection

Lehrman v. Lovo — Voice Cloning Class Action (S.D.N.Y.)

S.D.N.Y. · Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-03770 (S.D.N.Y.)

Voice actors Paul Lehrman and Linnea Sage sued AI voice-cloning startup Lovo, alleging Lovo cloned their voices through deceptive Fiverr commissions and resold the clones without consent. The case is the highest-profile U.S. voice-cloning right-of-publicity action and was certified in part in 2025.

Technical detail

Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-03770 (S.D.N.Y., filed May 16, 2024; Judge Jesse M. Furman). Claims: federal Lanham Act false endorsement, NY Civil Rights Law §§ 50 / 51 right-of-publicity, fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment. Feb. 2025: motion-to-dismiss largely denied; right-of-publicity and Lanham Act claims survive.

Who is protected: Voice actors and performers whose voices are cloned without consent

Who must comply: Lovo, Inc. and similarly situated AI voice-cloning services

Key facts

JurisdictionS.D.N.Y.
LevelFederal
StatusBlocked / in litigation
Protection strengthModerate protection
Effective date2024-05-16
CitationLehrman v. Lovo, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-03770 (S.D.N.Y.)
Topicsdeepfakes · consumer protection
Last verified2026-06-17
Official sourceLehrman v. Lovo — CourtListener 1:24-cv-03770 ↗

More AI rules in S.D.N.Y.

Related deepfakes rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.