HomeLegal DirectoryLorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg — FR wrongful arrest (2026)

Blocked / in litigation Moderate protection

Lorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg — §1983 Suit over Facial-Recognition Wrongful Arrest (D. Ariz.)

Arizona · Lorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg, No. 2:26-cv-04153 (D. Ariz. filed June 11, 2026)

Javier Lorenzano-Nunez sued Phoenix cold-case detective Dominick Roestenberg, the City of Phoenix, and two further individual defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona on 2026-06-11 in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Press accounts state he was arrested in 2024 for a 1998 Phoenix killing after investigators used facial recognition to identify him, spent roughly a year in jail, and had all charges dismissed on 2025-08-05 after DNA and fingerprint evidence excluded him, and that the suit alleges police knew his fingerprints did not match and that a detective misled the grand jury. The docket records the cause as 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Nature of Suit 550.

Technical detail

Docket 2:26-cv-04153, Senior Judge Roslyn O. Silver, referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine; plaintiff represented by Daniel R. Ortega Jr. Two individual defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim on 2026-07-14; the City of Phoenix defendants' response deadline was extended to 2026-08-13.

Who is protected: Individuals subjected to arrest based on facial-recognition identification, if the suit establishes liability.

Who must comply: The City of Phoenix and the individual defendants, if liability is established.

Key facts

JurisdictionArizona
LevelState
StatusBlocked / in litigation
Protection strengthModerate protection
Effective date2026-06-11
CitationLorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg, No. 2:26-cv-04153 (D. Ariz. filed June 11, 2026)
Topicsfacial recognition · police and surveillance AI
Last verified2026-07-26
Official sourceLorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg, No. 2:26-cv-04153 (D. Ariz.) — docket ↗

More AI rules in Arizona

Related facial recognition rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.