HomeLegal DirectoryMata v. Avianca (ChatGPT fake cites)

In effect Moderate protection

Mata v. Avianca — ChatGPT Fake Citations Sanctions Order (S.D.N.Y.)

S.D.N.Y. · Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)

Two New York attorneys submitted a brief containing six fictitious case citations generated by ChatGPT. In June 2023 Judge P. Kevin Castel sanctioned them $5,000 each — the first formal federal sanction for AI-hallucinated legal citations, and the most-cited case in subsequent bar opinions on attorney AI use.

Technical detail

Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023). Rule 11 sanctions of $5,000 against attorneys Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca for submitting brief with six fabricated ChatGPT-generated case citations. Court emphasized attorneys' duty to verify citations regardless of source.

Who is protected: Courts and opposing parties against AI-fabricated legal authorities

Who must comply: Attorneys practicing in U.S. federal court

Key facts

JurisdictionS.D.N.Y.
LevelFederal
StatusIn effect
Protection strengthModerate protection
Effective date2023-06-22
CitationMata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
Topicsconsumer protection · AI disclosure and transparency · automated decision-making
Last verified2026-06-17
Official sourceMata v. Avianca — CourtListener opinion ↗

More AI rules in S.D.N.Y.

Related consumer protection rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.