HomeLegal DirectoryPatel v. Facebook (BIPA)

In effect Stronger protection

Patel v. Facebook — $650M BIPA Settlement over Tag Suggestions (N.D. Cal.)

N.D. Cal. · In re Facebook Biometric Info. Privacy Litig., No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021); 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)

The largest biometric-privacy settlement in U.S. history at the time — $650 million paid by Facebook to roughly 1.6 million Illinois users whose facial templates were extracted by the 'Tag Suggestions' feature without BIPA consent. Each class member received about $400.

Technical detail

In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation (Patel v. Facebook, Inc.), No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal., filed May 14, 2015; Judge James Donato). Final approval Feb. 26, 2021: $650M common fund (increased from initial $550M); 1.6M class members, ~$397/claimant. Ninth Circuit affirmed class certification in 2019 (Patel v. Facebook, 932 F.3d 1264). Foundational ruling that BIPA's intangible-harm violation satisfies Article III standing.

Who is protected: Illinois users whose face geometry was extracted by Facebook between June 7, 2011 and Aug. 19, 2020

Who must comply: Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.)

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
StatusIn effect
Protection strengthStronger protection
Effective date2021-02-26
CitationIn re Facebook Biometric Info. Privacy Litig., No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021); 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)
Topicsbiometric data · consumer data privacy · facial recognition
Last verified2026-06-17
Official sourceIn re Facebook BIPA Litigation — CourtListener 3:15-cv-03747 ↗

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related biometric data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.